Explore how the High Court’s Bendel decision impacts trust liquidity and what the new 2026 reporting rules mean for your family’s investment strategy.

Today, 1 July 2026, marks a pivotal moment for the Australian private wealth landscape. As the new financial year commences, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has formally withdrawn its controversial Taxation Determination TD 2022/11, following a landmark High Court defeat in Commissioner of Taxation v Bendel. For over a decade, the interaction between family trusts and 'bucket companies' has been governed by the ATO’s view that unpaid profits held for a company were essentially loans. The High Court’s final word has overturned this logic, offering a significant liquidity reprieve for family businesses, yet simultaneously ushering in a period of heightened scrutiny under alternative integrity rules.

The End of TD 2022/11: Why UPEs are No Longer Automatic Loans

The core of the Bendel dispute rested on whether an Unpaid Present Entitlement (UPE)—where a trust allocates profit to a corporate beneficiary but retains the cash for working capital—should be treated as a 'loan' under Division 7A of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936. If classified as a loan, the trust would typically be required to pay the cash back to the company over seven years at an ATO-mandated interest rate (currently 8.27% for the 2026-27 year), often creating severe cash flow strain.

The High Court’s decision confirmed that a UPE is a distinct legal concept from a loan. By ruling that Division 7A does not automatically apply to these entitlements, the Court has effectively dismantled the ATO’s primary mechanism for forcing cash out of trusts and into companies. For many family-owned enterprises, this means the 'reinvested' capital within the trust can remain there without the immediate requirement for a formal Division 7A complying loan agreement, provided the funds are managed correctly.

Liquidity Reprieve for Family Trusts

The withdrawal of TD 2022/11 means that profit allocations made to corporate beneficiaries in previous years may no longer be subject to the rigid principal and interest repayment schedules previously enforced by the ATO. This allows for significantly greater flexibility in how family groups manage internal capital and debt-to-equity ratios.

The Persistent Shadow of Section 100A and Subdivision EA

While the Division 7A hurdle has been lowered, the ATO has clarified in today’s Decision Impact Statement that it will pivot its enforcement focus toward Section 100A and Subdivision EA. Section 100A is a potent anti-avoidance provision that targets 'reimbursement agreements'—situations where a beneficiary is made entitled to trust income, but another person (usually the trustee or a family member) actually enjoys the economic benefit of that income.

If the ATO determines that a corporate beneficiary was used primarily to access a 25% or 30% tax rate while the cash was used to fund the personal lifestyle of family members, they may invoke Section 100A. The consequences are severe: the distribution is taxed at the top marginal rate of 45% plus Medicare levy, and there is no time limit on how far back the ATO can audit these arrangements. Additionally, Subdivision EA still exists to capture instances where a trust makes a loan, payment, or forgives a debt to a shareholder of a corporate beneficiary using UPE funds.

Section 100A Compliance Check

The ATO is specifically looking for arrangements where the corporate beneficiary never receives the cash, and that cash is instead used to pay for private expenses or gifted to others without a commercial justification. Maintaining contemporaneous records of why funds were retained in the trust—such as for future business investment or debt reduction—is now a critical compliance requirement.

Digital Transparency: MTAS and the 2026 Reporting Mandate

The complexity of trust management has increased today with the full implementation of the Modernisation of Tax Administration Systems (MTAS). For the 2026-27 financial year, the ATO’s digital systems will now pre-fill individual tax returns based on the 'Statement of Distribution' lodged by trustees. This technological shift marks the end of the 'paper era' where distribution minutes could sometimes be reviewed and adjusted late in the tax season.

Three new granular labels have been added to the 2026 trust return, requiring trustees to specify exactly how much of a distribution was paid in cash versus how much remains as a UPE. These labels act as a digital 'tripwire' for the ATO. If a trust reports a distribution to a bucket company but the data shows the cash was diverted elsewhere, it will trigger an automated risk assessment. Trustees are now expected to maintain real-time digital ledgers to ensure that what is reported in the trust return perfectly aligns with the financial realities of the beneficiaries.

  • Real-time tracking of UPE balances is now essential to match pre-filled beneficiary data.
  • Trustees must ensure that distribution minutes are executed digitally by 30 June each year to meet MTAS standards.
  • Any discrepancy between the trust’s distribution statement and the beneficiary’s lodgment will likely result in an immediate ATO notification.

The 2028 Horizon: Preparing for the 30% Minimum Trust Tax

Perhaps the most significant structural challenge for investors is the recently announced 30% minimum tax on discretionary trust distributions, set to take effect on 1 July 2028. This measure is designed to eliminate the tax advantage of distributing trust income to family members in low-tax brackets. While this is two years away, the 2026-27 financial year is the critical 'strategy year' for those considering a restructure.

The Government has provided a three-year Capital Gains Tax (CGT) rollover window starting in 2027 to allow assets to be moved out of trusts and into corporate or individual names without triggering immediate tax liabilities. However, to qualify for these rollovers, the existing trust structures must be in a 'clean' state—meaning all UPEs and Division 7A issues must be resolved before the transition begins. The Bendel decision provides a temporary liquidity window that investors may use to clear up balance sheets in preparation for these 2028 reforms.

In summary, while the High Court has provided a victory for trust liquidity by decoupling UPEs from Division 7A, the introduction of MTAS and the looming 30% minimum tax means that the era of 'set and forget' trust management is over. Managing a family trust in 2026 requires a high degree of digital precision and a forward-looking strategy that accounts for both current anti-avoidance rules and the structural shifts coming in 2028. Specialist review of all unpaid entitlements is a logical first step to ensuring a trust remains a viable vehicle for long-term wealth preservation.

Set Up a Family Trust

Online legal platforms can prepare trust deeds and company trustee structures.

Learn more at LegalVision →

Are you a French expat in Australia?

Discover our cross-border wealth management resources — SCPI, assurance-vie, France-Australia tax strategy, and more.

Explore our French resources →

This article contains general educational information only and does not constitute personal financial, legal, or tax advice. Please consult a licensed professional before making any financial decisions.